Issue
#15
Welcome
to issue #15 of Hastings Westhill ABC's newsletter.
The newsletter
is published on an, as and when basis so check back to our
web site www.westhill-boxing.com
on a regular basis .
We are always
happy to publish editorials from guest authors, so if you
wish to assist us with this newsletter, simply email your
suggestions to:
info@westhill-boxing.com
"Ask
The Ref"
Referee
brothers Rees and Peter Hopcraft are on hand to answer your
questions.
Between
Rees (pictured left) and Peter there is very little that
will go unanswered so don't hesitate to send your questions
via email to:
info@westhill-boxing.com
All questions
and answers will be published in this, our regular newsletters
for the benefit of all.
This month's
question was a 2nd question sent in by Andy, a concerned
parent looking for sound advice.
Rees &
Peter, in the same vein as my previous question, have you
as a referee received any information in regard to a change
in the rule regarding mouth guards. There are rumours that
new rules are soon to be implemented but I cannot find any
details?
Andy,
Thanks for
your query and it is one that is in an ambiguous area but
really shouldn't’t be. The rules of the ABAE, Under
Rule 5, Paragraph K ‘DRESS’ state that “Red
Gum shields are forbidden.” (Having viewed your question
to you do not specify the ‘rule’ you query so
I will try and cover it all!)
The reason
that red gum shields are forbidden is because it would make
it harder for the referee to spot blood in the mouth. Personally
speaking, if a boxer was bleeding from the mouth then it
will be spotted, red gum shield or not, but the rule is
there for a reason, and that is for internal injuries. A
boxer could take a punch to the stomach, ribs, throat, or
kidneys, for example, and could be bleeding internally,
and not wishing for the bout to be stopped could be swallowing
blood, which
could have fatal consequences. Boxers are sometimes too
brave for their own good!!
The ambiguity
lies in the multi coloured gum shield which seems to be
becoming more fashionable. If there is red in it, then it
is not allowed. This poses a problem for the referee and
the OIC at ringside. You may have a boxer in the ring ready
to go and his shield has red in it. The referee, as I have
done in the past, would inform the OIC and ask for permission
to continue, which is usually granted with a warning to
the boxer to change his shield for the next contest. Again,
the
responsibility lies with the referee because the coaches
do not know the rules. So no red in gum shields please coaches,
even if it is the cross of Saint George or the Union Jack!!
If the boxer fails to heed the advice and meets a different
referee in the next bout then he might get away with it
again – sadly the fault of his coaches – until
he comes up against the original referee again, which is
likely at local level, and if it were me (and I remembered)
then the boxer would be out until another gum shield could
be found and as far I would be concerned it would then be
a problem for the OIC.
With gum
shields coming out of the mouth during a contest. If the
referee deems it to be accidental then the shield
is washed and replaced (note I always make the opposing
corner do it so no coaching can take place and no advantage
is gained). If the referee deems it has been spat out on
purpose then it is an illegal manoeuvre, and 2 cautions
and subsequent warning will result if done three times.
You cannot spit your gum shield out if you want a rest under
any circumstances. If you are in serious trouble and a referee
sees it as an obvious move of a boxer wanting ‘out’
then it is likely he will stop the bout.
As for receiving
new information about any rulings, the answer is, sadly,
no. Rule changes are made without informing the ‘grass
roots’ referees, and this is something which greatly
concerns me. Indeed, as an example, I was given the rule
change regarding standing counts for juniors and females
(2 in a round, 3 in a bout) by the OIC upon my arrival at
a show whilst I was getting changed. Laughable as it may
seem, this is the way it seems to be. I periodically view
the ABAE and AIBA web sites but other than that I have no
correspondence from the ABAE, I have asked other officials
and they say the same.
Hope this
helps – Good luck for the season
Rees Hopcraft
"Boxing
Action "
The
Grange Show, Margate - Oct 12th:
Three West
Hill lad's, Kyle Logan, Ben White and Barry Buchanan boxed
on the Grange Show, held at the Winter Gardens Margate on
October 12th along with Terry Freeman Of ATHA, Bexhill who
with his coach Mike Turner hitched a lift.
It was a
good night for both clubs as the lads recorded 4 wins from
4. Kyle boxed well and proved to strong for The Reach ABC's
G. Smith winning by a unanimous points decision. Ben White
continued to go from strength to strength extending his
winning streak over the home club's Jordan Evans, reversing
a previous loss to even the head to head score. Ben won
by a majority points decision.

Barry Buchanan
bounced back in convincing fashion after a previously disappointing
display by his own high standards in his last bout to win
well (unanimous points win) against Michael Reenee of Ramsgate
ABC
|